Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:Add new methods for retrieving messages and submitting tool outputs in AI21 API #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

HavenDV
Copy link
Contributor

@HavenDV HavenDV commented Sep 12, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced endpoints for retrieving messages and submitting tool outputs in the AI21 API.
    • Users can now fetch messages from specific assistant threads and submit outputs related to runs within those threads.
  • Enhancements

    • Added structured response models for messages and tool outputs, improving data handling and flexibility.
  • Documentation

    • Updated OpenAPI specifications to reflect new endpoints and response schemas, providing clearer guidance for API usage.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 12, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce new functionalities to the AI21 API, specifically for retrieving messages from assistant threads and submitting tool outputs. New methods and response models have been added to support these operations, including asynchronous methods for handling HTTP requests and responses. The OpenAPI specification has also been updated to reflect these new endpoints and data structures, enhancing the API's capabilities for managing assistant interactions.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.GetMessagesStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdMessagesGet.g.cs Added functionality for retrieving messages from a specified assistant thread, including asynchronous method and partial methods for extensibility.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.SubmitToolOutputsStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdRunsRunIdSubmitToolOutputsPost.g.cs Introduced functionality for submitting tool outputs to a specific run within an assistant thread, with asynchronous method and response handling.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.GetMessagesResponse.g.cs Defined the GetMessagesResponse class to encapsulate the structure of message retrieval responses, including required properties.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.MessageResponse.g.cs Created the MessageResponse class for structured representation of individual messages, including metadata and content properties.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsRequest.g.cs Defined the SubmitToolOutputsRequest class to facilitate submission of tool outputs, allowing for dynamic additional properties.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsResponse.g.cs Created the SubmitToolOutputsResponse class to handle responses from tool output submissions, with support for additional properties.
src/libs/AI21/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs Updated various property types to align with new response models and enhanced data handling capabilities.
src/libs/AI21/openapi.yaml Added new API endpoints for message retrieval and tool output submission, updating the OpenAPI specification accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 In a meadow of code, changes bloom bright,
New messages flutter, taking flight.
With tools in hand, we submit and retrieve,
In the world of AI, we weave and believe.
Hops of joy as endpoints expand,
Together we flourish, a digital band! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 540b66d into main Sep 12, 2024
3 checks passed
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot changed the title feat:@coderabbitai feat:Add new methods for retrieving messages and submitting tool outputs in AI21 API Sep 12, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 13

Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.GetMessagesResponse.g.cs (1)

1-24: LGTM! Consider adding meaningful XML documentation comments.

The GetMessagesResponse class and its properties are well-structured and follow appropriate naming conventions. The use of JsonPropertyName, JsonRequired, and JsonExtensionData attributes ensures proper serialization and deserialization of the JSON response.

To improve code readability and maintainability, consider adding meaningful XML documentation comments for the class and its properties. For example:

/// <summary>
/// Represents the response object for retrieving messages from an assistant thread.
/// </summary>
public sealed partial class GetMessagesResponse
{
    /// <summary>
    /// Gets or sets the list of message responses.
    /// </summary>
    [global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.JsonPropertyName("results")]
    [global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.JsonRequired]
    public required global::System.Collections.Generic.IList<global::AI21.MessageResponse> Results { get; set; }

    /// <summary>
    /// Gets or sets additional properties that are not explicitly defined in the schema.
    /// </summary>
    [global::System.Text.Json.Serialization.JsonExtensionData]
    public global::System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary<string, object> AdditionalProperties { get; set; } = new global::System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, object>();
}
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.MessageResponse.g.cs (6)

27-32: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The Content property is correctly defined as a required string. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property.


43-48: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The CreatedAt property is correctly defined as a required DateTime. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property, such as indicating that it represents the timestamp when the message was created.


50-55: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The UpdatedAt property is correctly defined as a required DateTime. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property, such as indicating that it represents the timestamp when the message was last updated.


57-62: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The Object property is correctly defined as a required string. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property, such as indicating the type of object this property represents.


64-69: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The ThreadId property is correctly defined as a required string. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property, such as indicating that it represents the unique identifier of the thread to which the message belongs.


71-75: Add a description to the XML documentation comment.

The AssistantId property is correctly defined as an optional string. However, the XML documentation comment is missing a description of the property. Consider adding a brief description to provide more context and clarity about the purpose and content of this property, such as indicating that it represents the unique identifier of the assistant associated with the message, if applicable.

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4004b73 and 3ea450d.

Files selected for processing (8)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.GetMessagesStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdMessagesGet.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.SubmitToolOutputsStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdRunsRunIdSubmitToolOutputsPost.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.GetMessagesResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.MessageResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsRequest.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsResponse.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/libs/AI21/openapi.yaml (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsRequest.g.cs
Additional comments not posted (9)
src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.SubmitToolOutputsResponse.g.cs (1)

1-18: LGTM!

The SubmitToolOutputsResponse class looks good:

  • The class is properly defined in the AI21 namespace.
  • The AdditionalProperties property is correctly defined to capture any additional properties in the JSON response.
  • The [JsonExtensionData] attribute is used correctly to serialize and deserialize the additional properties.
  • The property is initialized with an empty dictionary, which is a good practice to avoid null reference exceptions.

Overall, the class is well-structured and follows best practices.

src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Models.MessageResponse.g.cs (2)

11-25: LGTM!

The Role property is correctly defined as a required string, and the XML documentation comment provides clear and detailed information about the possible values and their meanings.


34-41: LGTM!

The Id property is correctly defined as a required string, and the XML documentation comment provides clear and detailed information about the purpose of the property.

src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.GetMessagesStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdMessagesGet.g.cs (1)

30-87: LGTM!

The GetMessagesStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdMessagesGetAsync method is well-implemented and follows the best practices for making an asynchronous HTTP request and processing the response. The method uses the ConfigureAwait(false) method to avoid capturing the current context and to improve performance. The method also uses the EnsureSuccessStatusCode method to throw an exception if the response status code is not successful, and the null-coalescing operator ?? to throw an exception if the response deserialization fails. The method uses the SourceGenerationContext.Default.GetMessagesResponse property to get the JsonSerializerOptions object for deserialization, which is a good practice. The method also uses the ref keyword to pass the threadId parameter by reference to the PrepareGetMessagesStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdMessagesGetArguments method, which is a good practice to avoid unnecessary string allocations. Finally, the method uses the using statement to dispose the HttpRequestMessage and HttpResponseMessage objects, which is a good practice to avoid memory leaks.

src/libs/AI21/Generated/AI21.Ai21Api.SubmitToolOutputsStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdRunsRunIdSubmitToolOutputsPost.g.cs (2)

36-107: LGTM!

The SubmitToolOutputsStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdRunsRunIdSubmitToolOutputsPostAsync method follows a standard pattern for making asynchronous HTTP requests and processing responses. It properly handles exceptions and ensures a successful status code before deserializing the response content.


116-130: LGTM!

This overload of the SubmitToolOutputsStudioV1AssistantThreadsThreadIdRunsRunIdSubmitToolOutputsPostAsync method provides a convenient way to call the API endpoint without having to create a SubmitToolOutputsRequest object explicitly. It delegates the call to the other overload, passing the required parameters.

src/libs/AI21/Generated/JsonSerializerContextTypes.g.cs (1)

Line range hint 1-760: Class structure looks good, but ensure the type changes are intentional and thoroughly tested.

The JsonSerializerContextTypes class appears to be a generated class used for JSON serialization and deserialization. It contains many properties, each representing a different type used in the serialization context.

The changes mostly involve modifying the types of these properties, which could have implications on how the data is serialized and deserialized. It's important to ensure that these type changes are intentional, and that they have been thoroughly tested to confirm they don't introduce any breaking changes or unexpected behavior.

Additionally, several new properties have been added at the end of the class, expanding the types that can be serialized. Again, make sure these additions are necessary and have been properly integrated with the rest of the codebase.

To verify the impact of these changes, I suggest running the following script:

src/libs/AI21/openapi.yaml (2)

1353-1376: LGTM!

The new GET endpoint for retrieving messages associated with a specific thread is well-defined, with the required thread_id parameter and the appropriate response schema.


Line range hint 2393-2737: LGTM!

The GetMessagesResponse and MessageResponse schema definitions are well-structured and provide a clear representation of the API response. The required fields are properly marked, and the field formats are appropriately used.

Comment on lines +372 to 374
public global::AI21.GetMessagesResponse? Type89 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure usages of Type89 are updated to handle GetMessagesResponse.

The type of Type89 has been changed from GetThreadRunResponse to GetMessagesResponse. This suggests it is now used for a different purpose. Make sure all code that uses Type89 has been updated to expect and handle the GetMessagesResponse type instead of GetThreadRunResponse.

Comment on lines +376 to 378
public global::System.Collections.Generic.IList<global::AI21.MessageResponse>? Type90 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Major type change for Type90, refactor usages carefully.

Type90 has undergone a major type change, from RunStatus to IList<MessageResponse>. This is a significant change from a single value to a list. All code that uses Type90 will need to be carefully refactored to handle a list of MessageResponse instead of a single RunStatus. Take extra care with this change and thoroughly test all affected code paths.

Comment on lines +380 to 382
public global::AI21.MessageResponse? Type91 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update usages of Type91 to handle MessageResponse.

Type91 has been changed from RunOptimization to MessageResponse. While this is still a single value, the different type needs to be handled correctly in all places where Type91 is used. Update these usages to expect and handle the MessageResponse type.

Comment on lines +384 to 386
public global::AI21.GetThreadRunResponse? Type92 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update usages of Type92 to handle GetThreadRunResponse.

The type of Type92 has been changed from HTTPValidationError to GetThreadRunResponse, switching between two different response types. Make sure all code that uses Type92 has been updated to expect and handle the GetThreadRunResponse type.

Comment on lines +388 to 390
public global::AI21.RunStatus? Type93 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Significant type change for Type93, carefully refactor usages.

Type93 has been changed from IList<ValidationError> to RunStatus, which is a significant change from a list to a single value. All code that uses Type93 will need to be carefully refactored to handle a single RunStatus instead of a list of ValidationError. This change requires extra attention and thorough testing.

Comment on lines +404 to 406
public global::AI21.ValidationError? Type97 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update usages of Type97 to handle ValidationError.

The type of Type97 has been changed from Highlight to ValidationError. Make sure all code that uses Type97 has been updated to expect and handle the ValidationError type.

Comment on lines +408 to 410
public global::System.Collections.Generic.IList<global::System.AnyOf<string, int?>>? Type98 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Type98 changed to complex list type, carefully refactor usages.

Type98 has been changed from LibraryAnswerRequest, a single request type, to IList<AnyOf<string, int?>>, a list of a complex AnyOf type. This is a significant change that will require careful refactoring of all code that uses Type98. Pay extra attention to correctly handle this list of complex types and thoroughly test the refactored code.

Comment on lines +412 to +760
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1J2JumboCompleteResponse2? Type166 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2GrandeInstructCompleteResponse? Type166 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1GetCustomModelsResponse? Type167 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2JumboCompleteResponse? Type167 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1CreateCustomModelResponse? Type168 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2JumboInstructCompleteResponse? Type168 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1GetCustomModelResponse? Type169 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2LargeCustomModelCompleteResponse? Type169 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1UpdateCustomModelResponse? Type170 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2GrandeCustomModelCompleteResponse? Type170 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetsResponse? Type171 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1J2JumboCompleteResponse2? Type171 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1UploadDatasetResponse? Type172 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1GetCustomModelsResponse? Type172 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetResponse? Type173 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1CreateCustomModelResponse? Type173 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1DeleteDatasetResponse? Type174 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1GetCustomModelResponse? Type174 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetDownloadUrlResponse? Type175 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1UpdateCustomModelResponse? Type175 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1ParaphrazeResponse? Type176 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetsResponse? Type176 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1EmbedResponse? Type177 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1UploadDatasetResponse? Type177 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::System.Collections.Generic.IList<global::AI21.FileResponse>? Type178 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetResponse? Type178 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1LibraryManagementResponse? Type179 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1DeleteDatasetResponse? Type179 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1AnswerResponse? Type180 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1GetDatasetDownloadUrlResponse? Type180 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1TokenizeResponse? Type181 { get; set; }
public global::AI21.V1ParaphrazeResponse? Type181 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1EmbedResponse? Type182 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::System.Collections.Generic.IList<global::AI21.FileResponse>? Type183 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1LibraryManagementResponse? Type184 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1AnswerResponse? Type185 { get; set; }
/// <summary>
///
/// </summary>
public global::AI21.V1TokenizeResponse? Type186 { get; set; }
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thoroughly review and test all type changes.

The remaining properties (Type99 through Type186) have undergone similar type changes as the ones reviewed in detail above. These changes include:

  • Switching between different single value types
  • Changing from single value types to list types and vice versa
  • Changing from one complex type to another

For each of these changes, it's crucial to:

  1. Identify all places in the codebase where these properties are used.
  2. Refactor the code to correctly handle the new types.
  3. Thoroughly test the refactored code to ensure it works as expected with the new types.

Pay special attention to changes that involve complex types or switching between single values and lists, as these will require the most significant refactoring.

Also, make sure the newly added properties (Type182 through Type186) are being used correctly and consistently with the rest of the codebase.

Given the extensive nature of these changes, I highly recommend a comprehensive testing strategy to verify that all affected functionality works correctly with the new types.

Comment on lines +3047 to +3052
SubmitToolOutputsRequest:
title: SubmitToolOutputsRequest
type: object
SubmitToolOutputsResponse:
title: SubmitToolOutputsResponse
type: object
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Define the request and response schemas.

The SubmitToolOutputsRequest and SubmitToolOutputsResponse schemas are currently empty, which makes it unclear what data should be sent in the request and what the API consumer can expect in the response.

To provide a clear contract for the submit_tool_outputs endpoint, please define the necessary fields and their types in the request and response schemas. Consider including information such as:

  • For SubmitToolOutputsRequest:

    • The structure of the tool outputs being submitted
    • Any additional metadata or parameters required for the submission
  • For SubmitToolOutputsResponse:

    • The status of the submission (success/failure)
    • Any relevant information or acknowledgment returned by the API

Defining these schemas will help ensure consistency and make it easier for API consumers to interact with the endpoint correctly.

Comment on lines +1470 to +1507
'/studio/v1/assistant/threads/{thread_id}/runs/{run_id}/submit_tool_outputs':
post:
summary: Submit Tool Outputs
operationId: submit_tool_outputs_studio_v1_assistant_threads__thread_id__runs__run_id__submit_tool_outputs_post
parameters:
- name: thread_id
in: path
required: true
schema:
title: Thread Id
type: string
format: uuid
- name: run_id
in: path
required: true
schema:
title: Run Id
type: string
format: uuid
requestBody:
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/SubmitToolOutputsRequest'
required: true
responses:
'200':
description: Successful Response
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/SubmitToolOutputsResponse'
'422':
description: Validation Error
content:
application/json:
schema:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/HTTPValidationError'
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tip

Codebase Verification

Review and update the SubmitToolOutputsRequest and SubmitToolOutputsResponse schemas.

The SubmitToolOutputsRequest and SubmitToolOutputsResponse schemas are defined but lack detailed properties and required fields. This could lead to issues with API consumers relying on these schemas for validation and data structure.

  • Ensure that these schemas are fully defined with necessary properties and constraints to maintain a clear and functional API contract.
Analysis chain

Verify the consistency of the referenced schemas.

The new POST endpoint for submitting tool outputs is well-defined, with the required thread_id and run_id parameters, and the appropriate request body and response schemas.

To ensure the consistency and completeness of the API specification, please verify that the referenced SubmitToolOutputsRequest and SubmitToolOutputsResponse schemas are properly defined in the components.schemas section of the OpenAPI document.

Run the following script to search for the schema definitions:

If the schemas are missing or incomplete, please update the OpenAPI document accordingly to maintain consistency and provide a clear contract for API consumers.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and structure of the referenced schemas.

# Test 1: Search for the request schema definition.
rg --type yaml -A 10 $'SubmitToolOutputsRequest:'

# Test 2: Search for the response schema definition.  
rg --type yaml -A 10 $'SubmitToolOutputsResponse:'

Length of output: 1224


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract detailed information about the properties and required fields of the referenced schemas.

# Test 1: Extract detailed information for the request schema.
rg --type yaml -A 20 $'SubmitToolOutputsRequest:' src/libs/AI21/openapi.yaml

# Test 2: Extract detailed information for the response schema.
rg --type yaml -A 20 $'SubmitToolOutputsResponse:' src/libs/AI21/openapi.yaml

Length of output: 1477

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant