Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Add reinvocationPolicy to the labeling webhook #385

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Sep 6, 2024

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
@tmshort tmshort requested a review from a team as a code owner September 6, 2024 22:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 6, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 33.95%. Comparing base (40cb322) to head (8c785f9).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #385   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   33.95%   33.95%           
=======================================
  Files          16       16           
  Lines         698      698           
=======================================
  Hits          237      237           
  Misses        435      435           
  Partials       26       26           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@perdasilva perdasilva left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 9, 2024
@perdasilva perdasilva added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 9, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 9, 2024
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 9, 2024

/hold
We might not both with this... so holding for now

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 9, 2024
@tmshort tmshort marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2024 13:21
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 9, 2024
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 9, 2024

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 9, 2024
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 9, 2024

Closing.

@tmshort tmshort closed this Sep 9, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants