Docker rebase #167
Docker rebase #167
Conversation
arcivanov
force-pushed
the
docker_rebase
branch
17 times, most recently
from
eddbdbb
to
824361c
Compare
|
@goldmann ping? |
|
Sorry I did not reply before. I'm pretty overloaded in the last months actually and this makes reviewing such contributions pretty tricky. I'm happy to have something like this added. his would need to be scheduled for next (major/minor) version. I did not plan to release anything new and have only bugfixes added since the codebase is pretty stable and there is not much to do with it, but it looks like I'm wrong. But thanks for the contribution, I'm happy to add it. After skimming the code it looks very good, but I haven't reviewed it in details yet, sorry! Would it be possible to write a short doc in the I guess I should add a note to myself to generally speaking, write some documentation :) |
|
Sorry I didn't see your reply for some reason. I will for sure write a doc. Thanks! |
Allows to rebase docker image on another parent. v2 support only (no means to test on v1).
|
@arcivanov If you can fix the conflicts and rebase then I'll take care of reviewing/merging it. |
|
Ha! I stopped using it several years ago... Let me see how much work that is... |
|
@arcivanov Understood. And apologies for the gigantic delay in this. I've started trying to review and solve some of the older issues and ensure it is still supported and working (primarily for https://github.com/cekit/cekit/ ) |
Allows to rebase docker image on another parent. v2 support only (no means to test on v1).