Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider Boxed Slices #375

Open
danakj opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Consider Boxed Slices #375

danakj opened this issue Sep 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
design Design of the library systems as a whole, such as concepts

Comments

@danakj
Copy link
Collaborator

danakj commented Sep 22, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Box<SliceMut<T>> could own the pointer in SliceMut (like Box<[T]> in Rust).

The advantage over Vec is really you don't have a capacity field anymore.

We'd need Vec::into_boxed_slice, Box<SliceMut<T>::from(Vec<T>), Box<SliceMut<T>::from_iter(IntoIterator<T> auto)
@danakj danakj added the design Design of the library systems as a whole, such as concepts label Sep 22, 2023
@danakj danakj mentioned this issue Sep 22, 2023
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
design Design of the library systems as a whole, such as concepts
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@danakj