Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Tables/Optimizing page display optimization #3157

Open
1 of 2 tasks
baiyangtx opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 2 tasks

[Feature]: Tables/Optimizing page display optimization #3157

baiyangtx opened this issue Sep 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
type:feature Feature Requests

Comments

@baiyangtx
Copy link
Contributor

baiyangtx commented Sep 2, 2024

Description

The Tables/Optimizing page should display the execution status of the Table Maintenance Process on the table.
By default, each row of records corresponds to an Execution.

The current Process API design cannot reflect the process of multiple retries of a Process. This is because Amoro currently only has Task-level retries and does not have the concept of Process-level retries.

In order to display the process being executed multiple times on the page without making major modifications to the front-end framework, here are the following suggestions:

  1. Add an additional execution-id to the current process data structure. This column will not be displayed. At the same time, the process id displayed on the frontend will be repeated.
  2. When querying Process details, use execution-id to query

In addition, this page has some additional optimization suggestions

  1. Supports back-end paging query and filtering, and supports filtering by Type, ProcessId, and Status.
  2. Support Process metadata dictionary, obtain the ProcessType enumeration and default query value supported by the current Table through the interface.
  3. Donot dispay FinishTime due to already have a Duration fields

Use case/motivation

No response

Describe the solution

No response

Subtasks

No response

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@baiyangtx baiyangtx added the type:feature Feature Requests label Sep 2, 2024
@zhangmo8
Copy link
Member

zhangmo8 commented Sep 2, 2024

1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:feature Feature Requests
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants