Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pitfalls in coupling extensions for Rabi-Dicke and JC #198

Open
cahitkargi opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Pitfalls in coupling extensions for Rabi-Dicke and JC #198

cahitkargi opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@cahitkargi
Copy link
Collaborator

  1. if no qubit or cavity object is given, these extensions search the given composite object (self) and its subsystems for these types of objects and couple the first such instances. Such a default behavior/assumption might cause un-intended couplings if there are more than 1 instance of such systems. These extensions should raise error if there are more than 1 such instance for either of these systems/objects.
  2. These extensions determine a qubit or spin object by looking at its .operator. This approach is very limited and does not work if their first term does not have an operator or have different operator than sigmaz/Jz (eg sigmax/Jx).
@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 27, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant